top of page

Mentorship, Artificial Intelligence, and Self-Awareness: Lessons from a Kappa League Visit

  • Writer: Marcus D. Taylor, MBA
    Marcus D. Taylor, MBA
  • 2 days ago
  • 6 min read
A group of young men stands together in a modern hallway at the UNT Health Fort Worth Regional Simulation Center, positioned near the center’s wall signage.
Students visit the UNT Health Fort Worth Regional Simulation Center during a group tour.

Listen to the Blog Article Below:

There are moments in mentorship that remind you why exposure matters.


Recently I had the opportunity to host a college visit for Kappa Leaguers from San Antonio, Texas at the University of North Texas Health Fort Worth. What began as a campus tour quickly turned into a deeper conversation about artificial intelligence, discipline, emotional awareness, and the responsibility that comes with knowledge.


What stood out most was not the technology the students encountered. It was the conversations that developed around it.


A Conversation About AI That Became a Conversation About Thinking


During the opening meet and greet, several of the young men asked questions about artificial intelligence, computer science, and electrical engineering.


I answered what I could from my experience. While my formal education is not in computer science or electrical engineering, my work in artificial intelligence strategy and research requires studying these fields and translating complex technologies into practical understanding.


The questions revealed something interesting.


Many of the students had already visited several universities, and they noticed a pattern. Regardless of the campus, they continued hearing the same words repeated:


  • Critical thinking

  • Responsibility

  • Sacrifice

  • Time discipline


At first, the repetition felt redundant to them.


Eventually it became clear that success in nearly every professional field requires the same foundational habits and mindset (Dweck, 2016; Duckworth et al., 2007).


Because they were curious about artificial intelligence, I explained something important.


Most people are not interacting directly with neural networks or complex machine learning systems. Instead, they encounter AI through conversational tools and digital assistants. The real skill is not simply accessing AI systems. The real skill is thinking critically about how those tools are used.


Artificial intelligence requires questioning responses, verifying information, and recognizing when an answer sounds confident but may still require validation.


Technology does not replace thinking. It requires stronger thinking.


The Consumer, Creator, and Builder Framework


At one point the discussion shifted toward a familiar concern: artificial intelligence replacing jobs.


Rather than framing it as a threat, I shared a framework I often use when discussing emerging technology.


Historically, disruptive technologies change work in three primary ways.


Some jobs disappear.

Some jobs evolve

New roles emerge that previously did not exist.


To help the students think about their own role in a technology-driven world, I introduced three categories.


The Consumer


Consumers exchange their time, attention, or resources for tools created by others.


Most individuals begin here. They use applications, software platforms, and services developed by someone else.


The Creator


Creators use tools to produce something new.


They might develop content, design graphics, write ideas, or produce solutions using available technologies.


The Builder


Builders construct systems, platforms, or solutions that others depend on.


They design processes, products, or environments that attract consumers and empower creators.


When I asked the students which category they saw themselves in, most identified as consumers or creators. The concept of being a builder was unfamiliar.


Builders often begin as consumers. They experiment as creators. Eventually they develop something that solves problems at a broader level.


Understanding that progression helped them recognize how technology education can eventually lead to ownership, innovation, and leadership.


Seeing the Details That Most People Ignore


After our discussion we toured the Simulation Center located on the first floor of the library.


The facility functions as a simulated hospital environment with exam rooms, medical technology, and clinical training spaces.


The students were impressed by the realism.


A group of students stands inside an immersive simulation room, observing projected images displayed across the surrounding walls while an instructor gestures and speaks.
Students explore an immersive simulation environment during a guided learning experience.

One of the most fascinating areas for them was a clinical hand-washing training station.

In healthcare environments, even something as routine as washing hands must be taught and evaluated. It cannot be assumed that everyone understands the correct procedure.


That moment revealed an important lesson.


Large systems often depend on small processes.


People frequently chase the “big picture” while overlooking the smaller actions that determine whether systems succeed. Attention to detail builds competence. Competence builds confidence. Confidence supports larger responsibilities (Bandura, 1997).


Technology, Creativity, and Career Possibilities


Later we visited the Division of Academic Innovation where the students saw our collaboration environment equipped with multiple large displays capable of hosting meetings with participants across the world.


They also met our animation and media specialists. One of the students expressed strong interest in animation, which opened a conversation about how animation intersects with multiple industries.


Advertising, sports broadcasting, digital learning, gaming, and marketing all rely on visual design and animation.


He was encouraged to begin developing a portfolio. A portfolio demonstrates growth, creativity, and skill far better than simply describing an interest.


Exposure to opportunities often expands how young people imagine their future.


The Science Behind Emotional Reactions


Before the visit concluded, we gathered for a final conversation about discipline, focus, and emotional control.


One of the students had experienced frustration the previous evening and reacted by throwing his phone.


Rather than criticizing the behavior, we used it as an opportunity to discuss how human reactions are influenced by both psychology and biology.


The body releases chemical messengers called hormones and neurotransmitters that affect emotion, behavior, and decision making (Gazzaniga et al., 2019).


Understanding these biological processes helps individuals recognize emotional reactions before they escalate.


Dopamine and Motivation


Dopamine is strongly associated with motivation and reward.


When individuals achieve goals or experience pleasurable outcomes, dopamine activity increases. This reinforcement encourages repeating behaviors that produce positive results (Schultz, 2016).


However, rapid stimulation through digital platforms can create artificial reward cycles that weaken focus on long-term objectives.


Serotonin and Emotional Stability


Serotonin contributes to emotional regulation and overall mood stability.


Healthy serotonin activity supports calmness, confidence, and well-being. Sunlight exposure, exercise, sleep quality, and positive social environments influence serotonin levels.


Reduced serotonin activity has been associated with mood disturbances and emotional volatility (Sapolsky, 2004).


Adrenaline and the Fight-or-Flight Response


Adrenaline prepares the body for immediate action.


During stressful or threatening situations, adrenaline increases heart rate, blood circulation, and alertness. This physiological response is commonly described as the fight-or-flight response (Sapolsky, 2004).


While this response can be beneficial in emergencies, it can also lead to impulsive reactions when emotional discipline is not developed.


Testosterone and Competitive Drive


Testosterone influences energy, competitiveness, and confidence.


Among adolescent and young adult males, testosterone can amplify reactions to conflict or challenge. When combined with adrenaline, it may intensify emotional responses and increase impulsive behavior if self-regulation skills are not developed (Gazzaniga et al., 2019).


Cortisol and Stress Regulation


Cortisol functions as the body’s primary stress hormone.


Short-term cortisol release supports alertness and energy during demanding situations. However, prolonged stress can elevate cortisol levels in ways that interfere with decision making and emotional regulation (Arnsten, 2009).


Learning to manage stress through awareness, rest, and healthy routines helps regulate cortisol and protect cognitive performance.


Awareness Is the First Step Toward Control


The purpose of discussing these hormones was not to conduct a scientific lecture.


The goal was awareness.


When individuals recognize signals such as increased heart rate, tension, or emotional agitation, they gain an opportunity to pause before reacting.


Many people simply tell young men to “fix their attitude.”

Yet emotional discipline often begins with understanding what the body is doing.


Awareness leads to control. Control leads to maturity (Bandura, 1997).


Why Mentorship and Exposure Matter


What made the visit meaningful was not simply the technology the students encountered.

It was the conversation.


They learned that artificial intelligence requires critical thinking rather than blind trust. They saw how careers connect across industries. They discovered that attention to small details often determines success.

Most importantly, they were reminded that growth requires discipline, curiosity, and accountability.


Mentorship does not exist to give young people every answer.

It exists to help them ask better questions and recognize possibilities they may not yet see.


Sometimes a single conversation, a campus visit, or a moment of reflection can shape how a young person approaches the future.


References


Arnsten, A. F. T. (2009). Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 410–422.


Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.


Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101.


Dweck, C. S. (2016). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.


Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2019). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind (5th ed.). W. W. Norton.


Sapolsky, R. M. (2004). Why zebras don’t get ulcers. Holt Paperbacks.


Schultz, W. (2016). Dopamine reward prediction error coding. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 18(1), 23–32.

1 Comment

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Omari
a day ago
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

This is dope Phi

Like
bottom of page