top of page

Awareness at Work: The Missing Ingredient in High-Performing Teams and Professional Growth

  • Writer: Marcus D. Taylor, MBA
    Marcus D. Taylor, MBA
  • Jun 13
  • 4 min read

Updated: Jun 16

A young African American woman stands confidently in a beige blouse at the forefront of a professional office space, with coworkers blurred in the background, symbolizing self-awareness and leadership in the workplace.
Awareness at Work: The Missing Ingredient in High-Performing Teams and Professional Growth” — capturing emotional presence in professional environments. Image generated by DALL·E.

In professional and academic environments, technical skills and credentials often get top billing. Yet many high-potential workplaces still underperform. Why? Because the most overlooked—and arguably most crucial—ingredient in sustainable success is awareness.


From classrooms to boardrooms, awareness governs how we show up, collaborate, manage conflict, and build trust. Without it, even the most competent individuals create friction, disengagement, and stagnation.


Let’s explore the different types of awareness that matter most in work and educational settings—and the high cost of their absence.


The Awareness Framework for Professional Success


1. Self-Awareness → Personal Accountability

Self-aware individuals know their triggers, emotional states, and areas for growth. According to Goleman (1995), self-awareness is a cornerstone of emotional intelligence (EQ), which is consistently linked to career advancement and leadership effectiveness.


In a workplace or school setting, this looks like:

  • Taking ownership for mistakes

  • Actively managing one’s attitude and energy

  • Seeking feedback without defensiveness


✦ Without self-awareness, mistakes are repeated, communication suffers, and growth is stunted.

2. Situational Awareness → Adaptive Communication

Professionals with high situational awareness read the room. They notice tension before it escalates, adapt to new group dynamics, and communicate with clarity based on audience and context (Endsley 1995).


This results in:

  • Better collaboration

  • Increased safety and respect in diverse teams

  • Reduced interpersonal friction


✦ Lack of situational awareness can result in tone-deaf behavior, exclusion, and conflict.

3. Emotional Awareness → Conflict Resolution and Empathy

Empathy is not optional—it’s a leadership skill. Emotional awareness allows professionals to de-escalate conflict, support team members, and handle interpersonal challenges with tact. EQ predicts 58% of job performance across industries (Bradberry and Greaves 2009).


Teams with high emotional awareness experience:

  • Greater cohesion and trust

  • Improved innovation through psychological safety

  • Stronger client and internal relationships

✦ Emotional blindness often results in toxic cultures, burnout, and low engagement.

4. Cultural and Social Awareness → Inclusive Leadership

Cultural intelligence is the ability to relate and work effectively across cultures. It depends on awareness of different communication styles, social norms, and lived experiences. Thomas and Inkson (2017) stress that culturally aware professionals are more likely to lead successful global teams.


✦ Leaders who lack social awareness often unintentionally exclude, alienate, or undermine colleagues.

The Fallout: What Happens Without Awareness?

Awareness Lacking

Resulting Problem

Self-awareness

Defensiveness, poor reflection, low adaptability

Situational awareness

Ineffective communication, workplace tension

Emotional awareness

Escalated conflict, lack of empathy, turnover

Cultural/social awareness

Exclusion, microaggressions, loss of talent

Accountability awareness

Pass-the-buck behavior, blame culture

These issues directly impact productivity, employee retention, student success, and team performance.


A meta-analysis by Clarke (2010) confirms that self-awareness and interpersonal competence are critical for organizational learning and transformation—without them, systems stagnate.


Who Is Affected the Most?


This is a cross-sector, cross-generational challenge—but the stakes are highest in these environments:

  • First-time professionals & new graduates: Often trained in technical tasks but not in emotional regulation or self-management

  • Multigenerational teams: Require situational fluency to avoid misinterpretation across age gaps

  • High-pressure work cultures: Stress reduces self-awareness and increases reactivity (McEwen 2017)

  • Educators & trainers: Influence culture—if unaware, they pass on unproductive behaviors


Rebuilding Awareness in Professional Settings

Here’s what organizations, educators, and leaders can do:


Normalize Feedback & Self-Reflection

Introduce reflection sessions after meetings or projects. Ask, “What did I contribute? What could I improve?”


Train for EQ, Not Just IQ

Incorporate emotional intelligence training into professional development programs. Include modules on active listening, empathy, and managing difficult conversations.


Build Mentorship Cultures

Senior professionals and instructors should model awareness. Mentors help mentees name blind spots and develop behavioral flexibility.


Reinforce Accountability Without Shame

Awareness should not be weaponized. Use failure as a teaching tool, not a platform for punishment. Accountability is more likely when people feel safe to admit mistakes.


Redesign Hiring and Evaluation

Move beyond technical qualifications. Screen for EQ, adaptability, and self-regulation. Behavioral interviews and simulations help assess these traits early.


Final Thought: Awareness Is the Real Differentiator

In an age where data is plentiful and degrees are common, awareness is what separates potential from performance. It fuels empathy, fosters collaboration, and anchors integrity. Without it, we get disjointed teams, misunderstood messages, and unrealized missions.

In schools, jobs, and leadership spaces, it's not always what you know or even who you know—but how well you know yourself and the room you’re in.


References

  • Bradberry, Travis, and Jean Greaves. 2009. Emotional Intelligence 2.0. San Diego: TalentSmart.

  • Clarke, Nicholas. 2010. "Developing Emotional Intelligence through Workplace Learning: Findings from a Case Study in Healthcare." Human Resource Development International 13(1): 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860903520375

  • Endsley, Mica R. 1995. "Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems." Human Factors 37(1): 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543

  • Goleman, Daniel. 1995. Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. New York: Bantam.

  • McEwen, Bruce S. 2017. "Neurobiological and Systemic Effects of Chronic Stress." Chronic Stress 1: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2470547017692328

  • Thomas, David C., and Kerr Inkson. 2017. Cultural Intelligence: Surviving and Thriving in the Global Village. 3rd ed. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.


1 Comment

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
AdriaBatt
Jun 18
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

Really appreciated this one, Marcus. :) The framing around awareness as the real differentiator—especially in high-pressure or multigenerational environments—feels so true to what we’re seeing across sectors. I also liked your attention to cultural and emotional awareness as leadership competencies, not just nice-to-haves.


I’d love to keep exploring how we build that kind of awareness in systems that don’t always reward reflection or vulnerability. It’s one thing to know what’s needed—and another to create the conditions for people to feel safe enough to get there.

Like

CONTACT ME

Thanks and I will contact you soon!

MEME.jpg

Training Development and Instructional Design

Phone:

972-292-8016

Email:

  • Black LinkedIn Icon
  • Black Facebook Icon
  • Black Twitter Icon
  • Black Instagram Icon

© 2024 By Marcus D. Taylor

bottom of page